Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41234 (KAR)

NISAR AHAMMED v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1867/2024 · 2026-09-11

Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010113302024 NC: 2026:KHC:49913 CRL.P No. 1867 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1867 OF 2024 BETWEEN: 1. NISAR AHAMMED AGED 34 YEARS, S/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ 2. MOHAMEMD FAROOQ SATHAR AGED 60 YEARS, S/O LATE ABDUL SATHAR 3. NASEEMA BANU AGED 57 YEARS, W/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ 4. FAREEN BANU AGED 27 YEARS, W/O IMRAN 5. MOHAMMED IMRAN AGED 32 YEARS, S/O NOT KNOWN R/AT BAPUJINAGAR 4TH CROSS, TANK MOHALLA SHIVAMOGGA-577201 6. SALMAN AGED 33 YEARS, S/O MOHAMMED FAROOQ PETITIONERS NO.1 TO 6 ARE Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010113302024 NC: 2026:KHC:49913 CRL.P No. 1867 of 2024 R/AT BAPUJINAGAR 4TH CROSS,TANK MOHALLA SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201 7. MUSTHAQ AHMED SAHEB, AGED 60 YEARS, S/O LATE SABU SAHEB R/AT FLAT NO.304, 3RD FLOOR, GOLDEN PLAZA BEHIND OLD TALUK OFFICE, UDUPI TALUK AND DISTRICT …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUDESH KUMAR ACHARYA U, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KAUP POLICE STATION, KAUP TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT-576101 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BUILDING, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU-560001 2. HEENA AGED 26 YEARS, W/O NISAR AHAMMED D/O MOHAMMED HANEEF R/AT HEENA MANZIAL UDDAKAT ANKUDRU UDYAVARA KAUP TALUK UDUPI DISTRICT …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. JAVEED.S, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.400/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010113302024 NC: 2026:KHC:49913 CRL.P No. 1867 of 2024 AND JMFC UDUPI FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S.323,504,506,498-A,354,149 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF DP ACT.I.A.NO.1/2024 FOR STAY.I.A.NO.1/2024 FILED BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PLEASED TO STAY ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.400/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF THE II ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC UDUPI FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S.323,504,506,498- A,354,149 OF IPC AND SEC.3,4 OF DP ACT PENDING DISPOSAL OF THE ABOVE PETITION, FOR THE REASONS STATED THEREIN. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K ORAL ORDER There is no representation for the petitioners even on the second call. This Court ordered to issue notice to respondent No.2 on 01.03.2024. Despite, the petitioners have not paid process. As such, the matter is lying at the stage of orders since two years. It seems that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, left with no other option, the petition is - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010113302024 NC: 2026:KHC:49913 CRL.P No. 1867 of 2024 dismissed for non-prosecution. Registry to communicate this order to the concerned Trial Court. If an application is filed to recall this order, the same would be considered subject to payment of costs of Rs.15,000/- SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE PKS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 3