Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4121 (UTT)

BILAL KHAN v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

ABA/332/2024 · 2026-03-16

Alok Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:1756 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 16.03. 2026 ABA No. 332 of 2024 Hon ’ble Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J. There is no representation for the applicant. 2 . Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, learned Brief Holder for the respondent. 3 . Mr. Shashi Kant Shandilya, learned counsel for the informant. 4 . The applicant has not deposited the cost of Rs.5,000/ -. 5 . The present Anticipatory Bail Application (ABA No. 332 of 2024) is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Alok Ku m ar Ver m a, J.) 16.03.2026 Shiv/