HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2513 of 2026 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE PRAVEEN KUMAR GIRI, J. 1. Shri Pravindra Singh, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he has preferred the instant criminal revision with the relief which has been mentioned in the prayer clause of the revision. 2. The relief which has been mentioned in the revision is delineated below:- "It is therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the present criminal revision and set-aside the impugned order dated 09.03.2026 passed by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Shamli at Kairana in Misc. Case no. 407 of 2025 (Smt. Manju Versus Devendra Singh), under Section 144(3) B.N.S.S., Police Station-Shamli, District- Shamli securing amount which have been deducted by opposite party no. 2 in execution Case No. 139 of 2025 under Section 144(3) B.N.S.S. and/or may pass any other and further order or direction which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case otherwise revisionist shall suffer irreparable loss and injury which cannot be compensated in any manner." 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that on 29.10.1999, the Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, District Shamli allowed the application filed under Section 125 Cr.P.C. directing the revisionist to pay Rs. 2,500/- per month to the wife-opposite party No.2. He further submits that the revisionist was serving in the Police Department as Constable at that time Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Devendra Singh, Pravindra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Devendra Singh .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) and on account of enhancement in the salary of the revisionist, the wife moved an application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. and vide order dated 13.07.2016, the learned Additional Principal Judge/F.T.C. Court No.4, Muzaffarnagar enhanced the amount of maintenance from Rs. 2,500/- to Rs. 5,000/-. 4. Learned counsel for the revisionist also submits that the pension amount of the revisionist was Rs. 21,570/- on 21.11.2015. 5. Learned counsel for the revisionist further submits that as on today, he has no knowledge whether the pension of the revisionist has been increased and he furhter submits that it is also not in his knowledge whether the wife has moved any further application under Section 127 Cr.P.C. 6. Learned counsel for the revisionist further submits that he does not want to press this revision and the same may be permitted to be withdrawn. 7. On the request of learned counsel for the revisionist, the present revision is dismissed as withdrawn. May 7, 2026 K.Tiwari CRLR No. 2513 of 2026 2 (Praveen Kumar Giri,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KANT TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad