RAVI PRALHAD BELDAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
BA/942/2026 · 2026-08-18
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4119 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4119 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
934ba942-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 934 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 942 OF 2026 Ravi Pralhad Beldar VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Another ... Mr. Patil Mangesh G, Advocate for the Applicant Mrs. Ashlesha Deshmukh, APP for the Respondent-State Ms. Shreyashree Pujari, Advocate for Respondent No.2 (appointed) CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 18th August, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. The learned Advocate for the applicant submits tat during pendency of the present application, the investigation is completed and charge sheet has been filed. He has instruction to withdraw the present application with liberty to file a fresh application before the trial court with copy of the charge sheet.
2. The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty to file fresh Application with charge-sheet before the learned Trial Court.
3. Fees of the appointed Advocate is quantified to Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) to be paid by the Legal Services Sub Committee, High Court, Aurangabad.
(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1