[2026:JHHC:6831] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.419 of 2025 ------ 1. Lakshmi Devi aged about 78 years, W/O late Jugesh Oraon, R/O Akarha Chowk near Bara Talab, Purani Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.: Sadar, Ranchi, Jharkhand- 834001 2. Amit Kumar Kachhap, aged about 46 Years, S/o late Jugesh Oraon, R/O Akarha Chowk near Bara Talab, Purani Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.: Sadar, Ranchi, Jharkhand- 834001 3. Deepti Kachhap, aged about 52 Years, D/O late Jugesh Oraon, R/O Akarha Chowk near Bara Talab, Purani Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.: Sadar, Ranchi, Jharkhand- 834001 4. Subhadra Kachhap aged about 55 Years, D/O late Jugesh Oraon, R/O Akarha Chowk near Bara Talab, Purani Ranchi, P.O. & P.S.: Sadar, Ranchi, Jharkhand- 834001 .... .... …. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Shri Chandrashekar, S/O Not Know, Principal Secretary, Revenue, Land Reforms & Registration Department, Government of Jharkhand, P.O. & P.S. – Dhurwa, Ranchi. 3. Shri Varun Ranjan, Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, Samaharanalya Block, P.O. & P.S. – Sadar, Kotwali, Ranchi. 4. Shri Ram Narayan Singh, Additional Collector, Ranchi, Samaharanalya Block, P.O. & P.S. – Sadar, Kotwali, Ranchi. 5. Shri Utkarsh Gupta, Sub-Divisional Officer, Ranchi, Samaharanalya Block, P.O. & P.S. – Sadar, Kotwali, Ranchi. 6. Mahesh Ram, The Circle Officer, Town Anchal, Ranchi, Samaharanalya Block, P.O. & P.S. – Sadar, Kotwali, Ranchi 7. Shri Raj Kumar Prasad, Circle Officer, Hehal, Piska More, P.S. – Sukhdeo Nagar, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Arpit Kumar, Advocate For the State : Ms. Laxmi Murmu, GP-I Mr. Navneet Toppo, AC to GP-I Mr. Sachin Kumar, AAG II For the O.P. No.2 : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No:-02 Dated:-13-03-2026 Heard the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the opposite parties submit that the order of this Court against which this Cont. Case (Civil) has been initiated, has been complied with. Therefore, it is submitted that this Cont. Case (Civil) be dropped. In view of the above, this Cont. Case (Civil) is dropped. The personal appearance of the opposite party No.6 is dispensed with. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated- 13.03.2026-Animesh/