Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41174 (PAT)

Bhupendra Yadav @ Bhupendra Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./78581/2025 · 2026-01-29

Rajesh Kumar Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78581 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2025 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Bhupendra Yadav @ Bhupendra Kumar Yadav Son of Laxman Yadav R/O Vill.- Sarfafur, P.S.- Udwantnagar, Dist.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 4 29-01-2026 Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 20.06.2025 in connection with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 310 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 19.06.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 74 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, the informant's cousin sister was attacked by her brother-in-law who is petitioner in the present case by means of sharp weapon due to which her hand got amputed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has clean antecedent and he has falsely been Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78581 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026 2/3 implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R and due to some previous dispute the present occurrence has taken place. Although there is specific allegation against the petitioner but there is no intention to kill anyone. 5. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submits that the wrist of the injured person has been amputed which is evident from the injury report reproduced hereinbelow:- "Injury- (1) Lacerated wound right upper limb 2" above wrist amputed distal part of right hand (2) sharp cutting wound of sixe 3"*2"* muscle deep right parietal region (3) Lacerated wound of size 5"*4"* muscle deep 3" poxime to left wrist joint (4) Lacerated of size 1"*1/2"* muscle deep on frontal parietal region (5) Lacerated of size 3"*2"* muscle deep left side upper part of chest (6) Lacerated 3"*2"* muscle deep right upper part M.I.- Mole on right side face A.I- <1 hours Nature of Injury- Injury no. 1&4 is Grievous Mob- 8987380304 Injury no. 2, 3, 5, 6 is simple" 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail in connection Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78581 of 2025(4) dt.29-01-2026 3/3 with Udwant Nagar P.S. Case No. 310 of 2025 pending in the court of learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara. 7. Prayer is refused. Vanisha/- (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U T