Item- 43. sg 15-09-2026 Ct. 6 CO 3019 of 2026 Samaendra Nath Mondal & Anr. Versus Narayan Mondal & Ors. [ Mr. Suman Sankar Chatterjee Ms. Bidisha Chakraborty …for the petitioners This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendants and is directed against an order being number 8 dated July 2, 2026 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Diamond Harbour, District 24 Parganas (South) in Title Suit No. 182 of 2026. By the order impugned, the application filed by the petitioner under Order 39 Rule 3A of the Code of Civil Procedure stood rejected. After some argument, Mr. Chatterjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that a direction be passed upon the learned Trial Judge to dispose of the injunction application within a specified time frame. The learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that hearing of the injunction application has been fixed sometime on 7th October, 2026. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to serve notice upon the opposite party. However the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order to the opposite party forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, this civil revision application is 2 disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Diamond Harbour, District 24 Parganas (South) to take up the hearing of the injunction application on the next date fixed, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing, and make an endeavor to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, but preferably within a period of three months from the next date fixed without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either side. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)