Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010282492026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 30th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14687/2026 Between: 1. NANDIMALLA RAMI REDDY, S/O BAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O 44-16-H-A 106, A BLOCK, GANDHI TOWERS, PRAKASH NAGAR, SUNKESULA ROAD, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE KURNOOL MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. A VIKAS, S/O A.S.N. GANDHI, R/O D.NO.40/582-A, CHALLA CHAMBERS, PHARMA PET CIRCLE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): -2- HN, J W.P.No.14687_2026 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction declaring the Notice issued by the Respondent No.2 vide bearing U.C.No.04/2020/WPRS 123 dated 15.05.2026 as per se illegal, manifestly arbitrary, unjust, capricious, whimsical, vindictive, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and in utter violation of Principles of Natural Justice besides being contrary to the provisions contemplated under Andhra Pradesh Land Encroachment Act, 1905, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 and Andhra Pradesh Municipal Corporation Act, 1994 and Rules made thereunder and consequently to set-aside the same and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to desist the Respondents from taking any further action by suspending the Notice issued by the Respondent No.2 vide bearing U.C.NO.04/2020/WPRS 123 dated 15.05.2026 and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POTHAM VENGALA REDDY SC For M.Corporation in Rayalaseema region In 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV -3- HN, J W.P.No.14687_2026 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further consideration, as the subsequent orders have been passed by the respondent authorities, which would be challenged by the petitioner(s). 2. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no adjudication on merits is required in this writ petition. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:30.06.2026 NKA -4- HN, J W.P.No.14687_2026 111 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14687 of 2026 Date: 30.06.2026 NKA