Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41146 (MAD)

M/S.Mahalakshmi Agro Traders v. The Deputy State Tax Officer 2

WP/23076/2026 · 2026-06-25

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 23076 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 23076 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.24993 & 24994 of 2026 M/S.Mahalakshmi Agro Traders Rep. by its Proprietor Palanivel, 3, Morappur Main Road, Kambainallur Village, Hosur, Dharmapuri 635302. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Deputy State Tax Officer 2 Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Harur Assessment Circle, Hosur. 2. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) (GST), Hosur. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the files of 1st respondent in impugned order in proceedings vide GSTIN 33BQVPP7963D1Z8 /2021 - 2022 dated 22.11.2025 along with consequential order in Form GST DRC-07 bearing a Ref. No. ZD331125394036J dated 22.11.2025 for the tax Period 2021 - 2022 and quash the same as arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23076 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr. S.Kannan Mr. Vighnesh Kumar.K For Respondents: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) ORDER An order dated 22.11.2025 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed an appeal and the same was rejected on the ground of delay. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23076 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 25-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To 1.The Deputy State Tax Officer 2 Office of the Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Harur Assessment Circle, Hosur. 2.The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT) (GST), Hosur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 23076 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 23076 of 2026 and WMP.Nos.24993 & 24994 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis