Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41143 (CAL)

MASURA BEGAM v. THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ORS

WPA/24620/2026 · 2026-09-15

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 177 15.09.2026 Court. No. 25 suvayan WPA 24620 of 2026 Masura Begam Vs. The Election commission of India & Ors. Mr. Srijib Chakraborty Ms. Rupsa Sreemani …for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey …for E.C.I. 1. The petitioner has preferred an appeal being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the deletion of her name from the voter list. The learned Tribunal has taken up the appeal and excluded the name of the petitioner form the roll. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appellate Tribunal has excluded the name of the petitioner from the roll without giving any opportunity of hearing and without considering the document which the petitioner has relied upon. 3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the appellate Tribunal is requested to restore the appeal of the petitioner and to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 4. As this Court has requested the appellate Tribunal for reconsideration of the request of the petitioner for inclusion of the name of the petitioner in the voter list, the authorities are restrained from taking any coercive steps against the petitioner on the ground the exclusion 2 of the name of the petitioner from voter list till the disposal of the appeal by the Appellate Tribunal. 5. WPA 24620 of 2026 is disposed of. 6. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities. (Krishna Rao, J.)