Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41116 (MAD)

JM ELECTRICALS v. DEPUTY COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

WP/22967/2026 · 2026-06-25

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 22967 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 22967 of 2026 and WMP.No.24882 of 2026 J.M. Electricals Represented by its Proprietor, Jameel Ahamed, Son of Abdul Azeez, No.15, Pallivasal Street, Avinashi Taluk, Annur, Coimbatore-641 653. ..Petitioner Vs 1. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Avinashi, Tiruppur. 2. Assistant Commissioner (ST) Avinashi Assessment Circle, Avinashi, Tiruppur. 3. The Branch Manager Indian Bank, Vadakalur Branch, No.1 133, Othimalai Road, Kariyagoundanur, Vadakkalur, Annur, Coimbatore-641 653. ..Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the order passed by the 1st respondent under in GST DRC-07 having Reference No. ZD331225351762J dated 23.12.2025 and the subsequent attachment proceedings bearing GSTIN: 33AIOPJ9360J1ZU/ 2021-2022 dated 30.03.2026 and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to defreeze the petitioner current account bearing Account No.6493347027. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22967 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner: Mr. K.S.Harish For Respondents: Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran Government Counsel (Tax) for R1 & R2 ORDER An order dated 23.12.2025 and the consequential recovery notice dated 30.03.2026 are assailed in this writ petition on the ground of alleged breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms. Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of respondents 1 & 2. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re- consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22967 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the attachment, if any, of the bank account of the petitioner in relation to the impugned order in the third respondent bank shall stand raised. 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 25-06-2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No KJ To 1.The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Avinashi, Tiruppur. 2.Assistant Commissioner (ST) Avinashi Assessment Circle, Avinashi, Tiruppur. 3.The Branch Manager Indian Bank, Vadakalur Branch, No.1 133, Othimalai Road, Kariyagoundanur, Vadakkalur, Annur, Coimbatore-641 653. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22967 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. KJ WP No. 22967 of 2026 and WMP.No.24882 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis