Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4111 (RAJ)

ROHIT S/O LADULAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3646/2026 · 2026-04-06

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14092] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3646/2026 Rohit S/o Ladulal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Panchpada, Thana Chabda, District Baran (Raj.) (Presently Confined In Sub Jail Hin- daun City, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Aditi Meena, Mr. Sahil Sharma, for Mr. Ashvin Garg For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 06/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioner in connection with FIR No. 0046/2026 registered at Police Station New Mandi Hindaun, District Karauli for offence under Sections 8, 21 of the N.D.P.S. Act 1985. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor as also perused the case diary. 4. The allegation against the accused-petitioner is that he is said to have sold the alleged recovered contraband i.e. 7 gram [2026:RJ-JP:14092] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3646/2026] 04 milligram smack which is recovered from the possession of the co-accused Mahesh. 5. The accused-petitioner has been implicated in this case with the aid of the Section 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and he is in custody since 30.01.2026 and police after completion of the investigation has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. Counsel also submits that the accused-petitioner is a young boy of twenty years. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the accused-petitioner has been implicated in the case with the aid of Section 8/29 of the N.D.P.S. Act and he is in custody since 30.01.2026 and co-accused namely Mahesh from whose possession the contraband has been recovered has already been enlarged on bail by a separate order in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2271/2026, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail. 8. 8. Accordingly, the present bail application is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lax Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:14092] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3646/2026] 9. However, it is made clear that in case the accused- petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution would be at liberty to move an application for cancellation of this bail order. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J SHRUTI SHARMA /25