Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41097 (CAL)

AMRITENDU PRADHAN v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR

CRM(R)/95/2026 · 2026-09-15

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15.09.2026 Serial no. 11 [G.S.Das] Assistant Registrar (Court) CRM (R) 95 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Special ST case no. 02(06)2025 and Special POCSO Case no. 14 of 2025 arising out of Sagar Police Station Case No. 18 of 2025 dated 13.02.2025 u/s 76/351(3) of the BNS and Section 10 of the POCSO Act. -And- In the matter of : Amritendu Pradhan … Petitioner(s) Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharya Mr. Supriyo Shasmal … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. Goutam Dey Mr. Dipak Khetawat … for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for one year seven months and the examination-in-chief of the victim has been completed. Learned advocate, therefore, prays that the petitioner may be released on bail on any stringent conditions on the ground of incarceration. Learned advocate for the State produces the case diary and draws the attention of the court to the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS as well as the medico-legal examination report. I have taken into account the overall circumstances of the case including the evidence of the victim. 2 Having considered the materials appearing therein, I am of the opinion that further detention of the present petitioner is unwarranted as 14 more witnesses are yet to be examined by the prosecution. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner viz, Amritendu Pradhan shall be released on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs.20,000/-(Rupees Twenty Thousand only), with two sureties of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Special court under POCSO Act, Kakdwip, South 24 Parganas. If on bail, the petitioner shall also make himself physically available on each and every date so fixed by the learned trial court and shall not leave the district of South 24 Parganas without prior permission of the learned trial court. Additionally, the petitioner shall not enter the jurisdiction of Sagar police station till further orders of this court. Accordingly, CRM (R) 95 of 2026 is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Memo of evidence and the copies furnished before this court be kept with the record. 3 Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)