Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41073 (KAR)

SMT.MAHABOOBI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/105088/2016 · 2026-09-22

Hema Kulkarni, M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:894-DB WP No. 105088 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 105088 OF 2016 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: SMT. MAHABOOBI I. RISALDAR, D/O. ISMAILSAB RISALDAR, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: UNEMPLOYED, R/O. THONKALSHAGALLI, INDI, DIST: BIJAPUR. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R. H. ANGADI, AND SRI. H. S. NAYAK, AND SRI. PRAKASH R. BADIGER, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT (PRIMARY), M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. THE DIRECTOR, (PRIMARY EDUCATION), THE COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, NRUPATUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE DEPUTY DIRECITOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION, CHIKKODI EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT, CHIKKODI, DIST: BELAGAVI. 4. MOHAMMOD HANIF BABUSAB JARI, ASSISTANT TEACHER, GOVERNMENT KANNADA HIGHER PRIMARY SCHOOL, PARMANANDWADI, CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Date: 2024.01.22 17:21:00 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:894-DB WP No. 105088 of 2016 RAIBAG TALUK, BELAGAVI DISTRICT-591329. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G. K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 3). THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PETITION AND QUASH OR ISSUE AN ORDER OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUNGED ORDER DATED 11.01.2016 PASSED IN APPLICATION NUMBER 7230/2013, PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, AT. BENGALURU, VIDE ANNEXURE-L AND A DIRECTION BE ISSUED TO THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 TO SELECT THE PETITIONER TO THE POST OF ASSISTANT TEACHER IN HINDI UNDER CATEGORY –IIB G. M. CATEGORY IN RECRUITMENT TO THE POSTS OF ASSISTANT TEACHER IN CHIKKODI EDUCATIONAL DISTRICT FOR THE YEAR 2001-2002 OR BY CREATING AN ADDITIONAL POST UNDER CATEGORY-IIB WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, S G PANDIT J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This writ petition is listed for non-compliance of office objections. 2. On 05.01.2024 in the morning session, at the request of learned counsel for petitioner, matter was passed over for compliance of office objection. When the matter was called at 2.45 p.m., none appeared for the petitioner. In the absence of counsel, finally one week time was granted for compliance of office objections on payment of costs of Rs.3,000/- to the High Court Legal Services Committee, - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:894-DB WP No. 105088 of 2016 Dharwad Bench, Dharwad. The office objections are not complied and cost is not deposited. 3. Today, in the morning session, again learned counsel for petitioner sought pass over of the matter for compliance and for payment of costs. When the matter was called at 2.45 p.m., there is no representation for the petitioner and office objections are also not complied. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed for non- compliance of office objections as well as for non-payment of costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE CLK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12