Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4106 (BOM)

ASHRAF AHEMAD MIRZA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

BA/1643/2026 · 2026-08-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

928appln1643-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1643 OF 2026 Ashraf Ahemad Mirza VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. Rameez M. Shaikh, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. D.Ghayal, APP for Respondent State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 21st August, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard the learned Advocate for the applicant and learned APP or the State. 2. Though the matter was argued substantially and even the learned APP has pointed out the material against the present applicant, this court, upon showing its disinclination to allow the application, the learned Advocate for the applicant, on instructions, seeks withdrawal of the application with liberty to file fresh application after filing of the charge-sheet. 3. Leave as prayed is granted. The Bail Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. 4. If the applicant prefers the fresh bail application alongwith charge-sheet before the trial court, then the trial court shall consider it on its own merits, in accordance with law. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:38174