Date of reserved for orders : - Date of pronouncement : 24.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010601092017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2087/2017 Between: 1. J.R. VENKATACHALAM, S/O J.N. RAMAIAH, AGED 63 YEARS, R/OBUCHIPALLE VILLAGE, P.T.M. MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. JYOTHINAGARAM GOVINDARAM DIED, - 2. SMT G SUJATAMMA, W/O. G.P. RAMAKRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O. GOLLA HALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA. 3. SMT G KOWSALYA, W/O. L.C. CHANDRA SEKHAR, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. YELDUR VILLAGE, SREENIVASPUR TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA. 4. SMT G MANJULAMMA, W/O. VENKATACHALAPATHY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. HIREKATTIGANA HALLI, CHINTAMANI TALUK, CHIKKABALLAPUR DISTRICT, KARNATAKA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the docket order dt.06.11.2015 in EP No.42/2010 in O.S No.58/1987 on the file of the Court of the Junior Civil Judge, Thamballapalle, Chitoor District. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2016(CRPMP 7644 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 279 days in filing the CRP. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to bring the proposed petitioners 2 to 5 on record in the present civil revision petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MANJUNATH ALLUR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 2087 of 2017 ORDER: Though the matter is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal", there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the earlier occasions, i.e., on 17.06.2026 and 22.06.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. 2. The present Civil Revision Petition was filed in the year 2017 challenging the docket order dated 06.11.2015 passed in E.P. No.42 of 2010 in O.S. No.58 of 1987. It is pertinent to note that O.S. No.58 of 1987 was decreed on 04.11.1992. 3. In view of the continuous absence of the petitioner, it appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Civil Revision Petition. 4. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closed. _______________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 24th June, 2026 cbn Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non reportable 4 195 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA C.R.P.No.2087 of 2017 24th June, 2026 cbn