IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77468 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2022 Thana- GURUA District- Gaya ====================================================== Hirday Paswan @ Hriday Paswan @ Hirdey paswan son of Kamal Paswan Resident Of Village- Kamaldah Ps- Paraiya Dist -Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Aryan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 3 11-02-2026 Heard the parties. 2. This is the second attempt of the petitioner for grant of regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 115 of 2025 / 23 of 2025 arising out of Gurua P.S. Case No. 2 of 2022 registered for the offence under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 07.05.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 28709 of 2025 which reads as under:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Gurua P.S. Case No. 02 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Four unknown criminals intercepted Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77468 of 2025(3) dt.11-02-2026 2/2 the informant and on the point of pistol and looted the mobile phone, cash, gold chain etc. The name of the petitioners have transpired during investigation in the self inculpatory statement of coaccused. The petitioners are also accused in six more similar and serious cases. The petitioners are in custody since 07.12.2024. 4. Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioners, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. 3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the State and the Informant that in the trial, out of 6 witnesses, 1 witness have already been examined. 4. In view of the fact that the trial is progressing, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. Vikas/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U