Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41040 (CAL)

CHANDTARA BIBI @ CHANTARA BIBI AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2799/2026 · 2026-09-15

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

15.09.2026 Court No.35. M/L.192. Rakib (Partly Allowed) CRM (A) 2799 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Chanchal Police Station case no. 1524 of 2025 dated 16.12.2025 under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/118(2)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Chandtara Bibi @ Chantara Bibi & Anr. ……Petitioners. Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Ms. Ayesha Najrin ......for the Petitioners. Mr. Debapratim Guha Ms. Soma Mishra Chatterjee ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submit that petitioners have been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the State has produced the Case Diary. I have taken into account the statement of the injured persons. Having regard to the same along with the injured reports, I am of the opinion that so far as the petitioner no.1, namely, Chandtara Bibi @ Chantara Bibi is concerned, she being a lady, her prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed. So far as the petitioner no.2 namely, Sadikul @ Sadikul Islam is concerned, having regard to the complicity, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 2 As such, in the event of arrest, the petitioner no.1 shall be released on bail to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer on such terms and conditions as he deems fit and proper subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 corresponding to Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Since, charge-sheet has already been submitted before the jurisdictional Court this order of anticipatory bail of petitioner no.1 shall remain in force for a period of six weeks from date. With the aforesaid observations, CRM (A) 2799 of 2026 is partly allowed. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)