Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8410] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 1008/2024 Kalua Ram S/o Jivar Ram, S/o Jiva Ram, Aged About 53 Years, Resident Of Village Patka, Panchayat Dundawal, Tehsil Nagar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Shruti Bhardwaj, District Collector, District Bharatpur (Now District Deeg), Rajasthan.
3. Anurag Harit, Sub Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Nagar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan.
4. Ankit Kumar, Tehsildar, Nagar, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Alakh Parashar, Adv. for Mr. Abhimanyu Singh Yaduvanshi,Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Pooja Dixit, Adv. and Mr. Manoj Choudhary, Adv. for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 24/02/2026 The instant contempt petition has been preferred against the respondents for non-compliance with the order dated 29.03.2023 passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10629/2021. After perusing the order (Annexure-3), it is evident that the respondents were directed to convene the meeting of the PLPC and in pursuance to the directions, the meeting was held on 01.05.2024, which shows that on the aforesaid land, no encroachment was found. It was also found that on Araji Khasra
[2026:RJ-JP:8410] (2 of 2) [CCP-1008/2024] Nos. 320 and 165, a receiver was appointed and SHO Sikari took the possession of the land in pursuance to the appointment of receiver by the Court. In the minutes of the meeting, it is also stated that the matter is still pending before the concerned Court. Therefore, looking to the aforesaid facts, no case of contempt is made out. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is disposed of and rule is discharged.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-19