BIJAY CHAND GUPTA AND ANR v. M/S RAGHAV INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED
CO/3189/2026 · 2026-09-16
Hiranmay Bhattacharyya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41024 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 41024 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item-
26.
sg
16-09-2026
Ct. 6
CO 3189 of 2026
BIjay Chand Gupta & Anr. Versus M/s. Raghav Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd.
[
Mr. Anirban Roy
…for the petitioners
This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the defendants praying for a direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 3rd Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas to dispose of the application filed by the petitioners for vacating the ad interim order of injunction. The learned advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the application for vacating the interim order was filed on 17th July, 2026 and the same is still pending. From the order sheets appended to this application, this Court finds that 3rd December, 2026 is fixed for hearing of the said application. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to serve notice upon the opposite party. However the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order to the opposite party forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, this civil revision application is disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), 3rd Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas to take up the hearing of the vacating application on 3rd December, 2026, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing, and to
2 dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities.
(Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)