Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 41005 (PAT)

Santosh Kumar Mandal v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./78739/2025 · 2026-02-09

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78739 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-278 Year-2025 Thana- Marnga District- Purnia ====================================================== 1. Santosh Kumar Mandal S/O Sri Chhote Lal Mandal Resident of Mohalla- Basant Bihar Colony, Newalal Chowk, P.S.- Maranga, Dist.- Purnea 2. Rohit Singh @ Rohit Kumar S/O Sri Anil Singh Resident of Mohalla- Basant Bihar Colony, Newalal Chowk, P.S.- Maranga, Dist.- Purnea 3. Aman Kumar @ Aman Sharma S/O Sri Suman Sharma @ Sohan Sharma Resident of Mohalla- Basant Bihar Colony, Newalal Chowk, P.S.- Maranga, Dist.- Purnea 4. Saurabh Singh @ Saurabh Kumar Singh S/O Sri Shankar Prasad Singh Resident of Mohalla- Basant Bihar Colony, Newalal Chowk, P.S.- Maranga, Dist.- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Mrs. Bharti Kumari, Mr. Kumar Manglam, Mr. Lal Mani Sharma and Mr. Hira Sharma, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 09-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 111(2) & 109 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from bare perusal of F.I.R., it is apparent that specific accusation Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78739 of 2025(2) dt.09-02-2026 2/2 of assault is against other co-accused persons. So far as these petitioners are concerned, they are only alleged to be members of the unlawful assembly. No specific overt act has alleged against these petitioners. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 5. In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Purnea in connection with Maranga P.S. Case No. 278 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T