- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010459632023 NC: 2026:KHC:50156 WP No. 19813 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 19813 OF 2023 (SC/ST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. R.ASWATHAIAH, S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 2. SRI. RAVI R., S/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 3. SMT. NEELAMMA, W/O. MUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT R/AT YEDIYURU VILLAGE, BAGALURU POST, YELAHANKA NORTH TALUK, BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAMESH KUMAR V., ADVOCATE - ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010459632023 NC: 2026:KHC:50156 WP No. 19813 of 2023 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU NORTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVAN, K.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 4. SRI. C.ANJINAPPA, S/O. LATE CHIKKAMUNIYAPPA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT BAGALURU VILLAGE, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT. 5. SRI. P.SRINIVAS, S/O. LATE PILLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT YADEYURU VILLAGE, BAGALURU POST, JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH (ADDL.) TALUK. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. K.SHIVASHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R4; R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010459632023 NC: 2026:KHC:50156 WP No. 19813 of 2023 ORAL ORDER Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Smt.Spoorthi V.HCGP, counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri.K.Shivashankar, counsel for respondent No.4 appeared in person. The petition is of the year 2023 and it is pending for almost three years. As already noted above, there is no representation no behalf of counsel for the petitioners. It appears the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28