Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40994 (CAL)

SHANKU BOSE v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/23776/2026 · 2026-09-16

Reetobroto Kumar Mitra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16/09 2026 AD/31/18 266312 NANDY (CO - DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/23776/2026 SHANKU BOSE VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Ms. Susmita Dey Basu, Advocate Mr. Kaustav Ghosh, Advocate ……for the Petitioner Mr. N.C. Bihani, Sr. Advocate Mr. Soumyajit Ghosh, Advocate ……for the CSTC Ms. Ankana Sarkar, Advocate ……for the State 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The petitioner is a retired employee of Calcutta State Transport Corporation (CSTC). He retired from service on attaining the age of superannuation on November 30, 2025. 3. The petitioner alleges that he has not received his provident fund dues. The petitioner prays for his provident fund dues along with interest on account of delayed payment of his terminal dues. 4. Reliance has been placed on an order dated May 12, 2026 passed by this Court in WPA/8290/2026. 5. As receiving the provident fund would be the statutory dues of a retired employee; accordingly, the employer would be duty bound to disburse the same immediately on retirement of the employee or soon thereafter. There ought not to have been any delay in disbursing the terminal dues of a retired employee. 6. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing the Managing Director, P a g e | 2 CSTC to take steps to release the entire amount of provident fund dues to the petitioner. 7. As the retired employee will receive the terminal dues after a considerable delay, accordingly, the amount shall be disbursed along with simple interest calculated at the rate of 6% per annum from the next date of retirement till the date of actual payment within twelve weeks from the date of communication of this order. 8. It is made clear that if the amount is not disbursed within the aforesaid time limit, then the petitioner would be entitled to receive 2% additional interest i.e. (6%+2%)=8% interest on the due amount calculated on and from the next date of retirement till the date 3 of actual payment. 9. The writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. 10. Parties to act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (REETOBROTO KUMAR MITRA, J.) P a g e | 3