Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4099 (HP)

Rohina @ Heena v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/197/2026 · 2026-02-23

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Rohina @ Heena Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Cr.MP(M) No. 197 of 2026 23.02.2026 Present: Mr. Ishan Sharma, Legal Aid Counsel, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent/State. Cr. MP(M) No. 197 of 2026 The applicant is convict and serving her sentence in Model Central Jail, Nahan (H.P). There is delay of 58 days’ in filing the appeal against conviction. For the reasons stated in the application, aforesaid delay is condoned and the application stands disposed of. Cr. A. (C-DB) No. ______/2026 (ST No.430 of 2026) Be registered. Notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Admit. Records be requisitioned. List for final hearing in due course after completion. Cr. MP No.___ of 2026 (CRMPST No.431 of 2026 Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, as prayed, be filed within a period of four weeks. List for consideration on 17.04.2026. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 23rd February, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez)