Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4099 (CAL)

MAHUA MISHRA AND ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/28402/2025 · 2026-02-11

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 3 11.02.2026 Court. No. 25 suvayan WPA 28402 of 2025 Smt. Mahua Mishra & Anr. Vs. The Union of India & Ors. Mr. Anil Kumar Chattopadhyaya …for the petitioners. Mr. Raj Kumar Gaurisaria …for the respondent nos. 1 to 4. 1. The matter is listed today under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on the prayer made on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. When the matter is called learned counsel for the petitioners has handed over a written instruction from the petitioners and submits that the petitioners have informed that the petitioners are not interested to proceed with the matter and requested the advocate to withdraw the writ application. 3. In view of the written instruction, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present writ application. 4. Considering the submission made the learned counsel for the petitioner, perused the written instruction WPA 28402 of 2025 is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. The interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. The copy of the written instruction be kept with the record. (Krishna Rao, J.)