IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.77481 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- DUMARIAGHAT District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Chhotu Pandey @ Barun kumar Pandey son of Tez Narayan Pandey Resident of village - Rampur Khajuriya, Ps- Dumariyaghat, Dist- East champaran 2. Raj Kumar Pandey son of Tez Narayan Pandey Resident of village - Rampur Khajuriya, Ps- Dumariyaghat, Dist- East champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 16-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 352, 351(2), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 117(2), 303(2) and 74 of B.N.S., 2023. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 13.03.2025 at about 10:30 p.m., all the accused persons including the petitioners came at the door of the informant and started abusing and caught his son Abhishek Pandey. Further, on orders of Vashishth Pandey, accused Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77481 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 2/3 Satyendra Pandey assaulted Abhishek Pandey by farsa causing injury, thereafter Satish Pandey assaulted Rajiv Pandey by farsa on head causing injury. It is next alleged that Vijay Pandey, Tej Narayan Pandey, Raj Kumar Pandey (petitioner no.2) and Chhotu Pandey (petitioner no.1) assaulted Rupesh Pandey with farsa causing injury. Thereafter, Rani Kumari, Puja Kumari, Anjali Kumari, Om Kumari Devi, Nirmala Devi and Manorma Devi caught the informant and assaulted by an iron rod causing fracture of right hand. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant with an allegation that they assaulted Rupesh Pandey by farsa along with three other accused persons causing injury. It is next submitted that allegation of assault is not specific and the injury suffered by Rupesh Pandey has been opined to be simple in nature. 5. Learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, are directed to be Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.77481 of 2025(2) dt.16-01-2026 3/3 released on bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Dumariyaghat P.S. Case No.65 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. 7. The application stands allowed. Sanjay/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T