CRWP-2561 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 112 SAVINA STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA P 1. directions to the respondents the respondent No.4 2. the petitioners have filed the representation P-5) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. 3. 2561-2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA P Mr. Vikramjeet Singh, Advocate Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. SURYA PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the directions to the respondents No.1 to 3 to protect their life and liberty from the respondent No.4 to 6. The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed the representation ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time. Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-2561-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 07.03.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners f to protect their life and liberty from The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that the petitioners have filed the representation dated 05.03.2026 (Annexure ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a Notice of motion to the respondents No.1 to 3 only. (O&M) 07.03.2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS petitioners for to protect their life and liberty from The learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that (Annexure ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.09 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-2561 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisit security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their marriage. The police authority o assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Vinod Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2561-2026 (O&M) 2 Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisit security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their marriage. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-5) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their marriage. The police District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It e safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their marriage. The police District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on VINOD KUMAR ARYA 2026.03.09 10:15 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document