IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.85034 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2024 Thana- KUDRA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1. Ravi Shankar Paswan S/o- Ram Nageena Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua 2. Shivshankar Paswan @ Bhola S/o- RamNageena Paswan R/o- Behera Nasej, Kaimur Bhabua 3. Ram Nageena Paswan S/o- Kawal Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua 4. Lakhshuman Paswan S/o- Kaval Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua 5. Vijendra Paswan S/o- Ravi Shankar Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Ghatawan, Kaimur, Bhabua 6. Rintu Kumar S/o- Laxman Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua 7. Nitish Paswan S/o- RAvi Shankar Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua 8. Domini Devi W/o- Ram Nageena Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua 9. Usha Devi W/o- Shivshankar Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Ghatawan, Kaimur, Bhabua 10. Amrita Kumari D/o-Ravi Shankar Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua 11. Mira Kumari D/o- Ravi Shankar Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Ghatawan, Kaimur, Bhabua 12. Anjali Kumari D/o- Ravi Shankar Paswan Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra Fakhrabad, Kaimur, Bhabua ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Suman Kumari D/o- Mangal Chaudhary Resident of Fakharabad, Kudra, Kaimur, Bhabua ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Alka Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Ravi Shankar Sahay, Advocate Mr. Rakesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.85034 of 2024(3) dt.08-01-2026 2/2 ORAL ORDER 3 08-01-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present application on the ground that cognizance has been taken against the petitioners and, as such, the stage of the case has changed, rendering the present application for quashing of the F.I.R. infructuous. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to approach this Court afresh by filing an appropriate application on new facts, in accordance with law. Alok Verma/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T