Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40968 (CAL)

PRASENJIT DAS @ PROSHON DAS v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/2902/2026 · 2026-09-17

Tirthankar Ghosh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

17.09.2026 M/L - 219 Court No.35 Rohan (Allowed) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M.(A) 2902 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 1046 of 2025 dated 13.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. -And- In the matter of: Prasenjit Das @ Proshon Das …Petitioner Mr. Amitabha Karmakar Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick …for the Petitioner Mr. Brajesh Jha, Ld. APP Ms. Mayukhi Mitra Ms. Rima Banerjee …for the State 1. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that because of previous grudge, petitioner has been implicated in the instant case. 2. Learned advocate for the State has produced the case diary, referred to relevant injury report as well as the statement of the injured. 3. I have taken into account the opinion in respect of the injury by one Dr. Abhinandan Majumder, which reflects that the injury is simple. 2 4. Having considered the same, I am of the opinion that although a case has been made out, complicity of the petitioner is there but custodial detention may not be required in the facts of the case. 5. Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner, namely, Prasenjit Das @ Proshon Das is allowed. 6. As such, I direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner be released on bail by the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer of the case on such terms and conditions as it deems fit and proper. This would be subject to the conditions under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. and/or under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. Since charge-sheet has already been submitted before the learned Jurisdictional Court, this order of anticipatory bail would be valid for a period of six weeks. 8. With the aforesaid observation, C.R.M. (A) 2902 of 2026 is disposed of. 9. Memo of evidence submitted be kept with the record. 10. All parties shall act in terms of the server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. 11. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)