Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-3861-2026
220
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
Kanhiya @ Poni State of Haryana
CORAM : HON'BLE MS Present: Mr. Kanishk Swaroop MANDEEP PANNU J.
1. This is the first petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR No. 420 dated 21.11.2025, registered under Sections 351(3), 191(3), 191(2), 190, 126, 118(1), 115 and 110 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Urban Est and 3(5) BNS were added, while Sections 191(3), 191(2) and 190 BNS were later deleted. 2. As per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner Kanh along with co-accused Shubham @ Tony and complainant. It is alleged that the petitioner and co caused injuries on the head of the complainant with an iron rod. It is further the case of the prosecution that wooden sticks were recovered fr house of the petitioner. 2026 (O&M)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.-
CRM Date of Decision :
Kanhiya @ Poni
VERSUS Haryana
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Mr. Kanishk Swaroop, Advocate for the petitioner. -.-
MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) This is the first petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Sanhita, 2023, for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR No. 420 dated 21.11.2025, registered under Sections 351(3), 191(3), 191(2), 190, 126, 118(1), 115 and 110 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at Police Station Urban Estate, District Hisar, wherein subsequently Sections 117(2) and 3(5) BNS were added, while Sections 191(3), 191(2) and 190 BNS were later As per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner Kanh accused Shubham @ Tony and Sunil @ complainant. It is alleged that the petitioner and co caused injuries on the head of the complainant with an iron rod. It is further the case of the prosecution that wooden sticks were recovered fr house of the petitioner. -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-3861-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 16.03.2026
....Petitioner
....Respondent MANDEEP PANNU , Advocate for the petitioner.
This is the first petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Sanhita, 2023, for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR No. 420 dated 21.11.2025, registered under Sections 351(3), 191(3), 191(2), 190, 126, 118(1), 115 and 110 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at ate, District Hisar, wherein subsequently Sections 117(2) and 3(5) BNS were added, while Sections 191(3), 191(2) and 190 BNS were later As per the case of the prosecution, the petitioner Kanhiya @ Po Sunil @ Sheelu gave beatings to the complainant. It is alleged that the petitioner and co-accused Shubham @ Tony caused injuries on the head of the complainant with an iron rod. It is further the case of the prosecution that wooden sticks were recovered from the roof of the
This is the first petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Sanhita, 2023, for the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in connection with FIR No. 420 dated 21.11.2025, registered under Sections 351(3), 191(3), 191(2), 190, 126, 118(1), 115 and 110 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 at ate, District Hisar, wherein subsequently Sections 117(2) and 3(5) BNS were added, while Sections 191(3), 191(2) and 190 BNS were later iya @ Poni gave beatings to the accused Shubham @ Tony caused injuries on the head of the complainant with an iron rod. It is further the om the roof of the TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.16 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-3861-2026
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the injury inviting the offence under Section 308 IPC/BNS is not attributed to the petitioner and the injury allegedly caused by the petitioner is simple submitted that the matter has now been amicably compromised between the parties.
4.
Notice of motion.
5.
Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG. Haryana, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent
6.
However, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the complainant-Sunny, has filed power of attorney and submitted that the matter has been compromised with the accused persons including the present petitioner and that the complainant has no also placed on record a copy of the affidav which reflects the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties.
7.
Without commenting on the merits of the cas the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, the affidavit of the complainant has been placed on record and learned counsel for the complainant has stated that he has no objection if the petitioner is released on considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last about three months, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind bars any further.
8.
Accordingly, the present petition is Kanhiya @ Poni is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Magistrate.
2026 (O&M)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the injury inviting the offence under Section 308 IPC/BNS is not attributed to the petitioner and the injury allegedly caused by the petitioner is simple submitted that the matter has now been amicably compromised between the Notice of motion. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG. Haryana, appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondent-State and opposes the bail petition. However, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the Sunny, has filed power of attorney and submitted that the matter has been compromised with the accused persons including the present petitioner and that the complainant has no objection if the petitioner is released on bail. He has also placed on record a copy of the affidavit furnished by the complainant which reflects the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties. Without commenting on the merits of the cas the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, the affidavit of the complainant has been placed on record and learned counsel for the complainant has stated that he has no objection if the petitioner is released on considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last about three months, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner behind bars any further. Accordingly, the present petition is ni is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty
-2-
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the injury inviting the offence under Section 308 IPC/BNS is not attributed to the petitioner and the injury allegedly caused by the petitioner is simple in nature. It is further submitted that the matter has now been amicably compromised between the Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG. Haryana, appears and accepts notice on the bail petition. However, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the Sunny, has filed power of attorney and submitted that the matter has been compromised with the accused persons including the present petitioner and objection if the petitioner is released on bail. He has it furnished by the complainant-Sunny, which reflects the amicable settlement arrived at between the parties. Without commenting on the merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, the affidavit of the complainant has been placed on record and learned counsel for the complainant has stated that he has no objection if the petitioner is released on bail, and further considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last about three months, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the Accordingly, the present petition is allowed and the petitioner ni is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the injury inviting the offence under Section 308 IPC/BNS is not attributed to the petitioner in nature. It is further submitted that the matter has now been amicably compromised between the Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG. Haryana, appears and accepts notice on However, Mr. Kunal Sharma, Advocate appearing on behalf of the Sunny, has filed power of attorney and submitted that the matter has been compromised with the accused persons including the present petitioner and objection if the petitioner is released on bail. He has Sunny, e and keeping in view the fact that the matter has been compromised between the parties, the affidavit of the complainant has been placed on record and learned counsel for the complainant bail, and further considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody for the last about three months, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the allowed and the petitioner ni is ordered to be released on regular bail, subject to furnishing of bail bonds/surety bonds to the satisfaction of the concerned Trial Court/Duty TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.16 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRM-M-3861-2026
9.
However, nothi of opinion on the merits of the case.
10.
All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
March 16, 2026 tripti
Whether speaking/non
Whether reportable 2026 (O&M)
However, nothing observed herein shall be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case. All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable
: Yes/No
-3- ng observed herein shall be construed as an expression All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(MANDEEP PANNU)
JUDGE : Speaking : Yes/No
ng observed herein shall be construed as an expression All pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.16 17:48 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document