KURAPATI ANANTHA BABU v. THE SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY
WP/9157/2026 · 2026-06-24
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4096 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4096 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 25.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010182262026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY, THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 9157/2026 Between:
1. KURAPATI ANANTHA BABU, 5/O LATE SUNDARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. ADVOCATE, R/O D.NO.8-17-49, SMAIL STREET WYNCHIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT- 520001
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SECUNDERABAD, HYDERABAD-500023
2. THE DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, VIJAYAWADA DIVISION VIJAYAWADA-520001
3. THE SENIOR SECTION ENGINEER PERMANENT WAY INSPECTOR SOUTH CENTRAL RAILWAY, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT-522202
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toThis Honble Court may be pleased to ISSUE an order or orders or direction or an appropriate writ more particularly one in nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in constructing the Compound Wall in the land belonging to the Petitioner in Field Survey No. 42/2 in the extent of 30 Cents situated at Vaddeswaram Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary, violative of Principles of Natural
RC,J W.P No.9157 of 2026
2
Justice, and against the well settled Principles of law, and violating the orders passed in WP.No.1866 of 2008 dated 31-07-2008 and OS.No.23 of 2008 dated 24-04-2013 consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's land and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above Writ Petition it is hereby prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to make any constructions and not to interfere with land in any manner in the land of the Petitioner in Field Survey No. 42/2 in the extent of 30 Cents situated in Vaddeswaram Village, Tadepalli Mandal, Guntur District and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. CHALLA AJAY KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
RC,J W.P No.9157 of 2026
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Writ Petition No:9157 of 2026 The Court made the following Order:
Sri. K.M.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner representing learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date:25.06.2026 Ksj
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No