Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010012892026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/104/2026 NAZMIN AHMED W/O- MUJIBUR RAHMAN R/O- WARD NO. 6 BENGENAKHOWA ARENGAPARA ROAD P.O. AND P.S.- GOLAGHAT DIST.- GOLAGHAT ASSAM PIN-785621 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY LD. P.P ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. M NATH Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA ORDER 12-02-2026 Heard Mr. M. Nath, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. D. J. Boro, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Borthakur, the learned Page No.# 2/3 Additional Public Prosecutor for the State respondent. 2. This is an application filed under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 praying for grant of pre-arrest bail to the accused/petitioner, namely, Nazmin Ahmed who is apprehending her arrest in connection with Golaghat P.S. Case No. 256/2025 under Sections 189(2)/191(2)/190/103(1)/117(2)/118(2)/109/3(5) of BNS, 2023. 3. Case diary received. Perused the same. 4. It is submitted by Mr. Nath, learned Senior Counsel that the present petitioner is innocent and is no way connected with the alleged offence. She was searched by police only for the fact that one of the accused namely, Ashiqur Rahman is her son. But she has no connection with her son as she already got divorced from her earlier husband and now she is staying separately with her present husband. 5. Mr. Nath, learned Senior Counsel further submitted that after obtaining the order of interim pre-arrest bail on 21.01.2026, she already appeared before the I.O. and cooperated in the investigation of the case. 6. However, she is still ready and willing to extend her cooperation in the further investigation of this case. 7. Mr. Borthakur, learned Addl. PP submitted in this regard that the petitioner already appeared before the I.O. and cooperated in the investigation of the case. 8. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for both sides and also considering the materials available in the case diary, I find that custodial interrogation of the petitioner may not be required for the purpose of investigation. Page No.# 3/3 9. In view of the above, the order of interim pre-arrest bail dated 21.01.2026 is hereby made absolute on the same terms and conditions. 10. This pre-arrest bail application accordingly stands disposed of. 11. Return the case diary. JUDGE Comparing Assistant