Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40926 (MAD)

Kodugusamy v. The State Represented by the Inspector of Police

CRL OP/15867/2026 · 2026-06-25

C Kumarappan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 15867 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 15867 of 2026 1. Kodugusamy 2. Vairasundaram ..Petitioners Vs The State Rep by The Inspector of Police, Palladam Police Station, Tiruppur. (Crime.No.263 of 2026) ..Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483(1) of BNSS, praying to modify the condition “the Petitioner/Accused each shall produce two sureties in that one surety must be a close relative (blood relative) another surety must be a local surety or a person providing proper proof and also the petitioner/accused must provided an insolvency certificate for the surety” in the order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam in Crl.M.P.No.282 of 2026 dated 05.06.2026. For Petitioners: Mr.P.Thinesh For Respondent: Ms.R.S.Indira Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to modify the condition imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam in Crl.M.P.No.282 of 2026 dated 05.06.2026 that “the Petitioner/Accused each https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15867 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 shall produce two sureties in that one surety must be a close relative (blood relative) another surety must be a local surety or a person providing proper proof and also the petitioner/accused must provided an insolvency certificate for the surety”. 2. The learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are unable to secure sureties within the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Court. However, he submits that they can arrange for the same from their native place. 3. Considering the above submission, this Court is inclined to modify the condition imposed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Palladam in Crl.M.P.No.282 of 2026 dated 05.06.2026. Accordingly, the condition that “the Petitioner/Accused each shall produce two sureties in that one surety must be a close relative (blood relative) another surety must be a local surety or a person providing proper proof and also the petitioner/accused must provided an insolvency certificate for the surety” is modified to the effect that “the petitioner/accused shall produce two sureties out of whom one should be a blood relative, and the petitioner/accused shall provide an insolvency certificate for the sureties”. Two weeks time is granted to comply with the modified condition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15867 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands ordered. 25-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VEDA To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Palladam. 2.The Inspector of Police, Palladam Police Station, Tiruppur. 3.The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court. 4.The District Jail, Tiruppur. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 15867 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. VEDA CRL OP No. 15867 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis