Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010388432019 NC: 2026:KHC:50297 CRL.P No. 4512 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.4512 OF 2019 BETWEEN:
MRS. YASMEEN AFZAL D/O SRI D M K AFZAL AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT 1ST MAIN, 1ST CROSS TELECOM LAYOUT AHSWATHNAGAR BANGALORE-560094
CORRECT ADDRESS:
NO.297, OLD KHATA NO.912 NEW HL NO.4082/913/297 THANISANDRA, K R PURAM BANGALORE-560036
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. A S KULKARNI, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY HENNUR POLICE STATION BENGAURU-560043 REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE-560001
Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010388432019 NC: 2026:KHC:50297 CRL.P No. 4512 of 2019
2.
MR ABDUL MURTADAR @ ASEEM WAHEED MOHAMMED S/O ABDUL WAHEED AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS R/AT NO.8-1-329/A-1 PLOT NO.17, KOHESAR COLONY SHAIKPET, TOWLI CHOWK HYDERABAD-500008 ANDHRA PRADESH
REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER SMT. RAFIA WAHEED W/O ABDUL WAHEED AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.8-1-329/A-1 PLOT NO.17, KOHESAR COLONY SHAIKPET, TOWLI CHOWK HYDERABAD-500008 ANDHRA PRADESH
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI MOHAMMED AYUB ALI, ADDL. SPP FOR R1)
THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR REGISTERED AGAINST THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 IN THE HENNUR POLICE STATION IN CR.NO.331/2018 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 468, 471, 474, 420 AND 120(B) R/W 34 OF IPC AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010388432019 NC: 2026:KHC:50297 CRL.P No. 4512 of 2019
ORAL ORDER The counsel appearing for the petitioner in the previous occasion also sought time to furnish the PF to issue notice to respondent No.2 and this Court granted the time as sought. Inspite of granting the time to pay the PF, till date, the same is not paid.
2. This matter is called twice i.e., in the morning session as well as in the afternoon session and there no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter. This matter is of the year 2019 and till date PF is not paid to issue notice in respect of respondent No.2. Hence, petition is dismissed for non-payment of PF to issue notice against respondent No.2.
Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE
SN