Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4092 (AP)

SMT. VEJENDLA SUGUNAMMA v. MR. VEJENDLA IRMAIAH

FCA/201/2010 · 2026-06-23

Balaji Medamalli, D Ramesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation:__________ Date of pronouncement :24.06.2026 Date of uploading :06.07.2026 APHC010463922010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3587] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 201/2010 Between: 1. SMT. VEJENDLA SUGUNAMMA, W/O. MR. VEJENDLA IRMAIAH HOUSEHOLD R/O. SIRIPURAM VILLAGE KOLLIPARA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. MR VEJENDLA IRMAIAH, S/o. Andraiah Travelers Ticket Examiner, Indian Railways R/o. vEjendla Village Chebrolu Mandal, Guntur District. ...RESPONDENT Appeal under section________ against ordersto set aside the order dated 31.07.2010 passed in DOP.No. 201/2009 on the file of the Family Court Judge, Guntur IA NO: 1 OF 2010(FCAMP 501 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order in DOP.No. 201/2009 dated 31.07.2010 on the file of the Judge Family court, Guntur pending final disposal of the main appeal Counsel for the Appellant: 1. T LAKSHMI NARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 201/2010 This Court made the following JUDGMENT (Per THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH) When the matter is take up for hearing today, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled outside the Court and, therefore, no cause survives for further adjudication. It is further submitted that the appeal has become infructuous. 2. Recording the said submission, the Family Court Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. _____________ D. RAMESH, J ____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI, J Dt: 24.06.2026 krk Whether the order is: Speaking ✓ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ✓ THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI 46 FAMILY COURT APPEAL (FCA) NO: 201/2010 Dt: 24.06.2026 krk