Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40912 (CAL)

PARIKSHIT MUNSHI v. DR. RIDHYEE CHATTERJEE

CO/1452/2024 · 2026-09-16

Dinesh Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16.09.2026 Court No.2 Item No.3-4 sudipta IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CO 1648 of 2024 with CAN 1 of 2025 Ridhyee Chatterjee Vs. Parikshit Munshi + CO 1452 of 2024 Parikshit Munshi Vs. Dr. Ridhyee Chatterjee Ms. Priyanka Jana Mr. Bikromjit Mandal Mr. Parimal Sardar …for the petitioner in CO 1452 of 2024 And opposite party in CO 1648 of 2024 Mr. Subhankar Nag Mr. Debdatta Saha Mr. D. Deb …for the opposite party in CO 1452 of 2024 And petitioner in CO 1648 of 2024 1. Present petitions have been filed challenging the common order dated 20th February,2024 in Misc. case no. 03 of 2016. The petitions were filed by the husband and wife challenging the same order regarding the grant of alimony by way of special provisions. However, during the pendency of the proceeding better sense prevailed and both the parties entered into mutual settlement and filed a 2 petition for grant of divorce on the mutual consent. Upon such petition being filed bearing Matrimonial Suit no. 148 of 2026 titled as Ridhyee Chatterjee Vs. Parikshit Munshi, the Court of learned Additional district Judge, 1st Court, Barasat, North 24 Parganas, granted divorce under Section 28 of the Special Marriage Act, 1954. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that since the parties have entered into mutual settlement, they do not want to continue with the present petitions. 3. Hence, the present petitions are disposed of as being settled / not pressed. 4. All parties shall act on the basis of the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J.)