Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4091 (PNJ)

VISHAL v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/13047/2026 · 2026-03-20

Mandeep Pannu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

207 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -.- CRM-M-13047-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 20.03.2026 Vishal ....Petitioner VERSUS State of Haryana …Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANDEEP PANNU Present: Mr. Aditya Partap, Advocate and Ms. Muskan Rana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Jasmine Gill, AAG Haryana. -.- MANDEEP PANNU J. (Oral) 1. The instant petition under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023 (corresponding to Section 438 Cr.P.C) has been filed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in FIR No.0667, dated 03.09.2025 under Sections 109(1), 61(2) and 238 of the BNS (corresponding to Sections 307, 120-B & 201 IPC) and Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959 registered at Police Station Sadar, Karnal. 2. This Court vide order dated 10.03.2026, while issuing notice of motion, granted the concession of interim bail to the petitioner, subject to his joining the investigation. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in pursuance to the order dated 10.03.2026, the petitioner has joined the investigation. 4. Learned State counsel, on instructions from SI Manoj Kumar, has stated that the petitioner has since joined investigation and he is no longer required for further investigation as of now. TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.20 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-13047-2026 (O&M) -2- 5. In view of the above, order dated 10.03.2026 is made absolute. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. 6. Pending application(s), if any, is/are disposed of. March 20, 2026 (MANDEEP PANNU) tripti JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Speaking Whether reportable : Yes/No TRIPTI SAINI 2026.03.20 17:32 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document