Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4090 (RAJ)

AMAR SINGH S/O LATE SHRI SURAJ BHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4049/2026 · 2026-03-28

Sameer Jain

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13170] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4049/2026 Amar Singh S/o Late Shri Suraj Bhan, R/o Basai, Police Station Neemrana, District Kotputli-Behror (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Sub Jail Behror). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramavtar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 502/2025 registered at Police Station Neemrana District Kotputli-Behror for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 3(5) of BNS, 2023 and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 109 of BNS, 2023 dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the date of incident is 24.08.2025, and FIR was registered on 07.10.2025. It is submitted that there was an altercation, in a fit of rage in-between father and son, wherein the son has suffered injuries. It is submitted that FIR is registered with an inordinate delay, and that the instant matter is of self defence. [2026:RJ-JP:13170] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4049/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant application. It is submitted that nature of injury is grievous/life threatening in nature and victim was in hospital. 4. Having heard the submissions made by learned counsel for the respective parties and taking note of the fact that the date of incident is 24.08.2025, and FIR was registered on 07.10.2025 i.e. with an inordinate delay of one and a half month; that the applicant and his son entered into altercation, and in a fit of rage, and as a self defence the said injuries were inflicted; and looking to the overall facts of the case and material on record but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the accused-applicant on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Amar Singh S/o Late Shri Suraj Bhan shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK /32