946ba1454-26 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 946 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1454 OF 2026 Vinayak Dnyanu Chavan VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra ... Mr. J. M. Murkute, Advocate for the Applicant Mr. S. D. Ghayal, Addl. PP for the Respondent-State CORAM : HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J. Dated : 18th August, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant. 2. The present application is for regular bail, in connection with the crime wherein the offence alleged against the present applicant are under sections 64(1), 87, 88 and 351(3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. It is the case of the prosecution that the informant and the present applicant were in relationship since 2022 and during the said period, they had physical relations with each other. There is an allegation at the behest of the prosecutrix that physical relationships were maintained under the false promise of marriage. There is one serious allegation pertaining to the prosecutrix getting pregnant on three occasions and on all the three occasions, the allegations is that the there was forced ermiantion of pregnancy. 3. After looking at the contents of the FIR, I was of the opinion 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:37596 946ba1454-26 that the allegations needs thorough investigation and therefore, pending investigation and pending of charge sheet, grant of bail will not be appropriate. Upon showing disinclination, the learned Advocate submits that the application may be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file fresh application before the trial court after filing of the charge sheet. 4. Request of the learned Advocate for the Applicant is accepted. Liberty to file fresh application before the trial court after investigation is completed and chargesheet is filed. If such an application is filed before the trial court, then the same may be decided on its own merits and in accordance with law. 5. The Application is disposed of as withdrawn. (HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.) JPChavan 2 of 2