Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4087 (RAJ)

CHHOTU S/O KISHAN SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3580/2026 · 2026-03-16

Ravi Chirania

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11041] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3580/2026 Chhotu S/o Kishan Singh, R/o Village Jaghina, Police Station Udyog Nagar, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Sewar, Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 16/03/2026 1. This misc. bail application has been filed by the petitioner Chhotu S/o Kishan Singh, who is behind the bars more than three months in connection with the FIR bearing No.526/2025 dated 27.09.2025. registered at Police Station Sewar, District Bharatpur for the offences punishable under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 3 and 5 of Arms Act, 1959 (Amendment 2019). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the FIR was lodged against unknown persons and the petitioner has not been named in the said FIR. Learned counsel further submits that the other co-accused persons, namely, Avtar Singh, having seven criminal antecedents, has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 02.02.2026. He further submits that another co-accused person namely, [2026:RJ-JP:11041] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3580/2026] Mahesh Gurjar, also having criminal antecedents has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide its order dated 17.12.2025. 3. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents. He further submits that the petitioner’s case is at a better footing than that of the co-accused persons who have already been enlarged on bail by this Court. In view thereof, learned counsel prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application. 5 This Court after considering the contents of the FIR and the fact that the co-accused persons having criminal antecedents have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. While maintaining the parity, this Court noted that the case of the present petitioner is at better footing than the other co- accused persons. Consequently, the present bail application is allowed. After considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the present petitioner on bail by allowing the present bail application. 6. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the accused-petitioner Chhotu S/o Kishan Singh shall be released on bail, provided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioner is further directed not to [2026:RJ-JP:11041] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3580/2026] take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Dushyant/88