ABHAY BIST v. SUPERINTENDENT CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX
WPMB/95/2026 · 2026-02-24
Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4086 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4086 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:1219-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J. AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J. 24th February, 2026
Writ Petition (M/B) No. 95 of 2026
Abhay Bist
------------Petitioner
Versus
Superintendant, Central Goods & Services Tax, Dehradun
--------Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Shri Rohit Arora, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel for the respondent.
JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.)
1.
The petitioner has assailed the order dated 30.05.2024 cancelling the GST registration of the petitioner on the ground that he had failed to file the returns within prescribed period.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in identical facts and circumstances in WPMB No.39 of 2025 a Co-ordinate Bench has permitted the petitioner therein to file application for revocation of the cancellation order and subject to deposit of unpaid tax along with interest and penalty, the competent authority has been directed to decide the application for revocation of the cancellation order. The operative part 1
2026:UHC:1219-DB of the order passed in the said writ petition is as follows:
“8. Accordingly, present writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to move an application for revocation of the cancellation order. If he makes such application within two weeks from today and also furnishes all the pending returns and deposits unpaid tax along with interest and amount of penalty, the Competent Authority shall consider the petitioner’s prayer for revocation as per law within four weeks from the date of receipt of such application.”
3.
It is urged that similar liberty may be granted to the petitioner.
4.
Ms. Puja Banga, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand appearing through V.C. has no objection in case the present writ petition is disposed of in the same terms.
5.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in the same terms as WPMB No.39 of 2025.
6.
Pending application, if any, also stands
disposed of.
(MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.)
(SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 24.02.2026 Kaushal
2