Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40854 (CAL)

SUBRATA BASU v. PRASANTA KUMAR BASU AND ORS

CO/659/2025 · 2026-09-16

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Court No. 6 (265719) 16.09.2026 (AD 1) (S. Banerjee) CO 659 of 2025 Subrata Basu Vs. Prasanta Kumar Basu & Ors. CAN 1 of 2025 Mr. Sajal Kumar Ghosh Mr. Atik Masud Molla … for the petitioner Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has instructed him not to proceed with this civil revision application. The written instruction given by the petitioner to the learned advocate-on-record, is taken on record. In the light of the submission made by the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, this revisional application stands dismissed as withdrawn. With the dismissal of the main civil revision application, the connected application, being CAN 1 of 2025, has become infructuous and the same also stands dismissed accordingly. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)