PRAVEEN KUMAR ALIAS PRAVEEN YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./7522/2025 · 2026-01-30
Rajesh Shankar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4085 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4085 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:2366 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.7522 of 2025 ----- Praveen Kumar @ Praveen Yadav, son of Narayan Yadav, resident of village-Nawada Basti, near Hanuman Mandir, P.O.- Jhumari Telaiya, P.S. Telaiya, District-Koderma.
.......... Petitioner. -Versus- The State of Jharkhand
........ Opp. Party. -----
CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Randhir Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Fahad Allam, A.P.P. -----
Order No.02
Date: 30.01.2026
1. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest for the offence punishable under Sections 132, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No.191 of 2024 pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Koderma.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s anticipatory bail application was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 7th December, 2024 passed in A.B.A. No.7633 of 2024. By way of present anticipatory bail application, the petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail, primarily for the reason that after investigation the police has submitted charge-sheet against him and other co-accused persons in pursuance of which vide order dated 12th April, 2025 the cognizance of the offence under Sections 132, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS has been taken by the concerned trial court.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for a while submits that he wants to withdraw the present anticipatory bail
2026:JHHC:2366 2
application with liberty to the petitioner to surrender and seek regular bail before the concerned trial court in the light of the guidelines laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of “Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.” reported in 2022 (10) SCC 51 as well as the observation made by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of “Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.” reported in 2024 (9) SCC 198.
4. Considering the said submission, the present anticipatory bail application is disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
(Rajesh Shankar, J.) 30th January, 2026 Rohit/