19.02.2026 Serial no. 300ML [G.S.D] [Original Copy] CRM (M) 2707 of 2025 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with POCSO Case No. 50 of 2025 arising out of Raiganj PS Case No. 521 of 2025 dated 19.05.2025 u/s 4 of the POCSO Act, 2012. -And- In the matter of : Sabir Alam … … Petitioner(s) Mr. Indranuj Dutta Ms. Benazir Sk. … for the Petitioner(s) Mr. P. K. Datta, ld. APP Mr. S. Bhakat … for the State-respondent(s) Mr. Kaushik Choudhury … for the defacto-complainant(s) Report submitted be kept with the record. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for nine months and presently charges have been framed, date has been fixed for commencement of witness action. Learned advocate for the defacto- complainant/private opposite party opposes the prayer for bail. Learned advocate for the State has drawn the attention of the court to the statement of the victim under section 183 of the BNSS as well as the medicolegal examination report. 2 Having considered the same, I am of the view that till the examination of the victim is over, it would not be fit and property to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected. However, the learned trial court would, if it is possible, prepone the date for evidence of the victim Accordingly, CRM(M) 2707 of 2025 is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)