Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40837 (KAR)

SRI LAKSHMANANAIKA v. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER

WP/33578/2024 · 2026-09-16

C M Poonacha

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010699002024 NC: 2026:KHC:50681 WP No. 33578 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA WRIT PETITION NO. 33578 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI LAKSHMANANAIKA S/O SAKRYANAIAKA AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, 2. SRI RAMANAIKA S/O SAKRYANAIAKA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, 3. SRI SHANKARANAIAKA S/O RAM JI NAIK AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 4. SRI H T HARIYANAIKA S/O THIMMANAIKA AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, 5. SRI MEETYANAIKA S/O SOMIANAIAKA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, 6. SRI SHANKARANAIAK S/O HEMLANAIKA AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 7. SRI SOMLANAYKA S/O PEERYANAYKA AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010699002024 NC: 2026:KHC:50681 WP No. 33578 of 2024 8. SRI DESHYA NAIK S/O ROOPLA NAIK AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, 9. SRI RAM NAIK S/O RUPLLA NAIK AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, 10. SMT SOMLIBAI W/O MITYANAIK AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS, 11. SRI SHYAMA NAIK S/O THAVARYA NAIK AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, 12. SRI SATHEESH NAIK S/O LACHMA NAIK AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT HASTHINAPURA VILLAGE, SAKHARAYAPATNA HOBLI, KADUR TALUK, CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT 577135 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. KALLEGOWDA S K.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TARIKERE SUB DIVISION, TARIKERE TALUK, TARIKERE 577228 2. THE TAHSILDAR TALUQ OFFICE KADUR, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIST 577135 3. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010699002024 NC: 2026:KHC:50681 WP No. 33578 of 2024 SAKARAYAPATNA GRAMPANCHAYATH, SAKARAYAPATNA VILLAGE AND POST, KADUR TALUK, CHIKKAMAGALURU DIST - 577135 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL KARIAPPA, AGA FOR R1 & R2 SRI. ASHOK N NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD 01.10.2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-J AND KPOST THIS WP FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING BEFORE SINGLE JUDGESN- 10.12.2024. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. POONACHA ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed seeking for the following reliefs: " a) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent NO.1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 01.10.2024 vide Annexure-J and K. b) Issue such other orders/directions as deemed fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice" 2. The petitioner has submitted representations dated 01.10.2024 (Annexure-J and K to the writ petition) to the Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010699002024 NC: 2026:KHC:50681 WP No. 33578 of 2024 Assistant Commissioner and Tahsildar, respectively for grant of sites under the Ashraya Scheme. Since the said representations have not been considered, the present writ petition is filed. 3. In view of the aforementioned, the present writ petition is disposed of by directing respondents Nos.1 and 2 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 01.10.2024 in accordance with law and intimate the petitioner the result of such consideration. Needful to be done within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 4. Pending IAs., if any, stand disposed of. (C.M. POONACHA) JUDGE Vmb List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48 Digitally Signed by CHEPPUDIRA MONNAPPA POONACHA