[2026:RJ-JP:15079] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4887/2026 Bheema Kathat S/o Pappu Kathat, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Panghat Badiya Chitar, P.s. Sendra, District Beawar. (Presently Lodged At District-Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4888/2026 Ameen Kathat S/o Mewa, R/o Jhujharo Ka Badiya, P.s. Beawar Sadar, District Beawar. (At Present Confined In Distt Jail Beawar) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta Mr. Deshraj Kalwania For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 10/04/2026 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.76/2026 registered at Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Beawar for offence under Sections 54, 55, 60(b), 61(2) and 111(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 4 and 25 of Arms Act. 2. Since both these bail applications arise out of common FIR, hence, they are being decided by this common order. [2026:RJ-JP:15079] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4887/2026] 3. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 4. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in these cases. They further submit that the allegations against the present petitioners pertain to their alleged involvement in a conspiracy to commit murder. There is no specific allegation/incident about facilitating the commission of organized crime and no specific act was attributed to them. They further argued that for the purpose of offence under Section 111 BNS, 2023 which deals with Organized Crime, it is necessary that against a person as a member of organized crime syndicate or on behalf of such syndicate, more than one charge-sheet must have been filed before the competent court within the preceding period of 10 years but no such charge- sheets within the proceeding period of 10 years have been filed against the present petitioners. The petitioners are behind the bars since 13.03.2026. No criminal antecedents have been reported against petitioner Bheema Kathat, whereas only one criminal antecedent has been reported against petitioner Ameen Kathat. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and the bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 5. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 6. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on [2026:RJ-JP:15079] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4887/2026] merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 7. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Bheema Kathat S/o Pappu Kathat and Ameen Kathat S/o Mewa, be released on bail provided they furnish a personal bond each of them in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/31-32