Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40817 (KAR)

VISHAL KUMAR N v. SRI M KRISHNA

COMAP/255/2025 · 2026-09-16

D K Singh, H Shanthi Bhushan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304612025 NC: 2026:KHC:50626-DB COMAP No. 255 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO. 255 OF 2025 BETWEEN: 1. VISHAL KUMAR N AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS SON OF SRI NARENDRAJAIN, RESIDING AT NO 3C-313, 2ND FLOOR, ABOVE APPAREL 36 MENS CLOTHINT STORE, GANESH TEMPLE STREET, HOTEL SUKHSAGAR CROSS KAMMANAHALLI BENGALURU 560084 MOBILE CONTACT 96205963479 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MOHAMMED HAROON RASHEED., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI M KRISHNA AGE ABOUT 75 YEARS, SON OF LATE MARAPPA, RESIDING AT NO M73, KARIYANNAPALYA, IN BETWEEN CHANDRASHEKAR INSTITUTE AND CHANDRIKA SOAP FACTORY, Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304612025 NC: 2026:KHC:50626-DB COMAP No. 255 of 2025 H M ROAD, ST THOMAS TOWN POST, BANGALORE 560084 MOBILE NO 919986098524 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. S.MUNIRAJU FOR C/R (CP No.8396/25)) THIS COMMERCIAL APPEAL / COMAP IS UNDER SECTION 13(1A) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER, JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY HONBLE LXXXVIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, (EXCLUSIVE COMMERCIAL COURT), AT BENGALURU (CCH-89) IN COM. OS NO.769/2024 DISPOSED ON DATE 27.02.2025. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) This Court while granting interim order on 21.08.2025, directed the appellant to deposit entire decreetal amount as well as the compensation at the rate of Rs.50,000/- per month. 2. The said interim order has not been complied with. 3. When the matter was called out in the first call in the morning, no one was present on behalf of the appellant. Even in the revised call, no one appeared to press the appeal. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010304612025 NC: 2026:KHC:50626-DB COMAP No. 255 of 2025 It appears that the appellant has lost interest in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE RKA CT:SN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11