[2026:RJ-JP:16345] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3830/2026 1. Sitaram S/o Dataram, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Rawato Ki Dhani, Tan Bilali, Thana Basdayal, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Kotputli). 2. Inderaj S/o Dataram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Rawato Ki Dhani, Tan Bilali, Thana Basdayal, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Kotputli). 3. Vikram S/o Gadaram, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Samda Wali Dhani, Tan Bhaislana, Thana Sarud, District Kotputli Behror, Rajasthan. (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Kotputli). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pankaj Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, Public Prosecutor Mr. Manish Gupta for complainant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 on behalf of accused-petitioners in connection with FIR No.586/2025 registered at Police Station Kotputali, District Kotputali-Behror for the offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 333, 140(3), 352, 351(2), 308(2) and 303(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard. [2026:RJ-JP:16345] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3830/2026] 3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant. 4. As per the facts on record, the allegations against the accused-petitioners are that they kidnapped the complainant for ransom and after kidnapping the complainant, they demanded Rs.18,00,000/-. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioner No.1-Sitaram was working with the complainant by engaging his Truck. The accused- petitioner No.2-Inderaj is the driver of the Truck and the accused- petitioner No.3-Vikram is the accountant. 6. It is also submitted by counsel for the petitioners that when the accused-petitioners demanded money and remuneration from the complainant just to avoid obligations of the payment, the complainant has lodged this criminal case. 7. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners further submits that all the alleged articles have already been recovered by the Police and the accused-petitioners are no more required for any kind of interrogation or recovery and they are in custody since 16.02.2026. 8. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by counsel for the complainant opposed the bail application. Learned counsel appearing for the complainant submits that investigation of the case is still going on and therefore, the accused-petitioners may not be released on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:16345] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3830/2026] 9. On consideration of submissions, this Court prima-facie finds that the articles which were alleged to have been taken by the accused-petitioners have already been recovered by the Police and looking to the submissions made by counsel for both the parties, the possibility of money dispute cannot be ruled out. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits or demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 10. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners named above shall be enlarged on bail provided, each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- together with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Ashish Kumar /34