Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 40787 (MAD)

Kathiresan Deenathayalan v. Tamil nadu Commercial taxes Department

WP/22817/2026 · 2026-06-25

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 22817 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 22817 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.24752 & 24753 of 2026 Kathiresan Deenathayalan M/s. KP Engineering 42 Kanni Amman Kovil Street Kachanankuppam SIDCO Industrial Estate Ambattur, Tiruvallur - 600098 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Tamil nadu Commercial taxes Department The Deputy State Tax officer-1, Pattaravakkam Assessment Circle, 23WG plus QWF commercial taxes building Room No.7 Bengaluru Chennai Hwy Varadarajapuram, Nazarathpettai, Poonamallee-600 123 ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, call for the records in the file of the Respondents and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and devoid of merit of the Respondent impugned order dated 04.12.2025 with GSTIN 33APZPD1960Q1Z7/2021 - 22 passed under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act (‘Act’) for the year 2021 - 22 along with the summary order u/s 73 dated 04.12.2025 with reference number ZD331225069334J (impugned order) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22817 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Sudhakar For Respondent(s): Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) ********** ORDER An order dated 04.12.2025 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. Mr.R.Sethu Prabakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 3. On perusal of the impugned order, it is evident that such order was issued without hearing the petitioner. The writ petition has been filed after the period of limitation expired. 4. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand as a condition for remand. An endorsement to that effect has been made on the bundle. 5. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22817 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. Subject to fulfilment of the above condition, the bank attachment shall stand raised. 6. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected writ miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 25-06-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No RNA To Tamil nadu Commercial taxes Department The Deputy State Tax officer-1, Pattaravakkam Assessment Circle, 23WG plus QWF commercial taxes building Room No.7 Bengaluru Chennai Hwy Varadarajapuram, Nazarathpettai, Poonamallee-600 123 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 22817 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. RNA WP No. 22817 of 2026 and W.M.P.Nos.24752 & 24753 of 2026 25-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis