Date of reserved for orders :-- Date of pronouncement :02.07.2026 Date of uploading :04.07.2026 APHC010716432011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 17001/2011 Between: 1. PERAVALLI HARINATH, KRISHNA DIST, S/O BUTCHAIAH CHOWDARY AGRICULTURE HINDU, R/O. KOLAVENNU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMISSIONER ENDT DEPT HYD 3 OTHERS, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT BOGGULAKUNTA, HYDERABAD. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER GRADEIII, ENDOWMENT DEPARTMENT SRI DHARMA CHERUVU, KOLAVENNU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be 2 pleased toto issue an approprriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondents in refunding the amount of Rs.3,50,000/- collected towards advancement for the leasehold rights of Fish in Tank admeasuriing Ac.20.77 cents in RS No.485 situated at Kolavennu Village, Kankipadu Mandal, Krishna Disttrict belonging to the 4th respondent temple despite of the orders of this Hon'ble Court dt.16- 11-2010 in WP No.28319 of 2010 as arbitrary, illegal, capricious and consequently direct the respondents to refund the amount along with interest forthwith and passs IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 20426 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to refund the amount to the petitioner as per the order dt.16-11-2010 in WP No.28319 of 2010 forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition in this Hon'ble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V T M PRASAD 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.17001 OF 2011 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that despite his best efforts, he was unable to secure instructions from the petitioner and that the matter pertains to the year, 2011. He, therefore, prayed that the writ petition be dismissed for non prosecution. 2. Recording the said submissions, the present Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 02.07.2026 KBN Whether the order is: Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 39 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.17001 of 2011 Date: 02.07.2026 KBN